Proactive information governance - insights from Legal Tech NY 2014
As stated in my last article in the Records Mgmt Journal (https://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/600001224/)
one of the most difficult challenges in IG implementation is to develop a sustainable value proposition for specific business functions.
Top 10 Information Governance trends discovered during Legal Tech NY 2014 seem to confirm this!
especially the second trend is exactly the hard one:
" ....only benefits/value consideration would be able to sustain an IG program designed to take control of your information."
How true! excellent statement.
see:
http://animeshkum.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/top-10-ig-trends-ltny2014/
Yes. "Law firm partners and attorneys are increasingly being asked by their clients to advise on proactive information governance options rather than help with reactive e-discovery actions."
...this would mean more investments in content driven IM (appraisal of information and master data, metadata, tagging etc.) instead of "garbage in garbage out" activities of uncontrolled big data.
Enterprise search and predictive coding cannot help much when the input quality of the data (description) is so poor. Automation is not yet ripe to fully replace intellectual intervention.
Professional records managers have to take a resonsibility in this orchestration.
SEE ALSO: the summary of #LTNY by Barclay Blair
https://twitter.com/btblair/status/433372609053741056
one of the most difficult challenges in IG implementation is to develop a sustainable value proposition for specific business functions.
Top 10 Information Governance trends discovered during Legal Tech NY 2014 seem to confirm this!
especially the second trend is exactly the hard one:
" ....only benefits/value consideration would be able to sustain an IG program designed to take control of your information."
How true! excellent statement.
see:
http://animeshkum.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/top-10-ig-trends-ltny2014/
Yes. "Law firm partners and attorneys are increasingly being asked by their clients to advise on proactive information governance options rather than help with reactive e-discovery actions."
...this would mean more investments in content driven IM (appraisal of information and master data, metadata, tagging etc.) instead of "garbage in garbage out" activities of uncontrolled big data.
Enterprise search and predictive coding cannot help much when the input quality of the data (description) is so poor. Automation is not yet ripe to fully replace intellectual intervention.
Professional records managers have to take a resonsibility in this orchestration.
SEE ALSO: the summary of #LTNY by Barclay Blair
https://twitter.com/btblair/status/433372609053741056
jhagmann - 16. Feb, 15:47
