<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/rss2html.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
> 

  <channel rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/">
    <title>Records Mgmt  &amp; Archiving : Rubrik:SharePoint</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:publisher>jhagmann</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-06T20:06:46Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</sy:updateBase>
    
    <image rdf:resource="http://static.twoday.net/icon.gif" />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/351210729/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/96990076/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/41784928/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/19466910/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/11508465/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/8376503/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6461659/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6353081/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6189419/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6170057/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6130497/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5818822/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5738790/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5534450/" />
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5512772/" />

      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  <image rdf:about="http://static.twoday.net/icon.gif">
    <title>Records Mgmt  &amp; Archiving</title>
    <url>http://static.twoday.net/icon.gif</url>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/</link>
  </image>

  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/351210729/">
    <title>History is repeating itself</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/351210729/</link>
    <description>From Lotus Notes to Sharepoint and Social Media&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Sharepoint a failed vision for collaboration?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswire.com/cms/social-business/is-sharepoint-a-failed-vision-for-collaboration-020271.php&quot;&gt;http://www.cmswire.com/cms/social-business/is-sharepoint-a-failed-vision-for-collaboration-020271.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However we will judge the history of KM and collaboration, the cornerstone is not technology but people and culture or behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
When we talk about information governance either, the point is not a lack of visions and good policies but the true commitment to business alignment and trust according to desirable behaviour when it comes to implementation in the real world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unsurprisingly, IT and business executives both lack the time, inclination and knowledge required to undertake yet another enterprise authority for an unmanaged asset such as data. This inattention by&lt;br /&gt;
information-intensive organizations to managing their data as an asset means lost revenue, higher costs, increased liabilities and damaged reputation. (Gartner)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The future of competition is about outbehaviour not outperformance.&lt;br /&gt;
(Dov Seidman - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howistheanswer.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.howistheanswer.com/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sachachua.com/blog/2009/09/brainstorming-around-smart-work/&quot;&gt;http://sachachua.com/blog/2009/09/brainstorming-around-smart-work/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2013 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2013-04-28T11:44:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/96990076/">
    <title>Shortchanged by Sharepoint</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/96990076/</link>
    <description>Shortcomings of Sharepoint when using it as a document mgmt strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
this was predicted since years ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idatix.com/5-reasons-you-are-getting-shortchanged-by-sharepoint-2/&quot;&gt;go to post&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2012 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T05:27:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/41784928/">
    <title>DoD certification of Sharepoint 2010</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/41784928/</link>
    <description>Gimmal Group has recently completed the records management certification of native SharePoint 2010 add-ons based on the DoD 5015.2 standard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aiim.org/community/blogs/expert/DoD-50152-Certification-and-SharePoint-2010&quot;&gt;AIIM Blog ERM&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2011 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2011-09-27T13:02:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/19466910/">
    <title>Sharepoint sites are sprawling and governance is needed</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/19466910/</link>
    <description>An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioupdate.com/insights/article.php/3933021/Prolific-SharePoint-Sites-Undermine-Governance.htm&quot;&gt;article in the CIO update &lt;/a&gt;makes clear:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The key to managing SharePoint team sites, as with all electronic information, is the disposition (e.g., deletion) of information once it no longer has business value and is not subject to a litigation hold or regulatory retention requirement.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly this phenomena was predicted 3 years ago by AIIM in an article entitled: Put a stop at the Sharepoint sprawl (sic!)&lt;br /&gt;
eDoc magazine Jan/Febr. 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But techies did not listen to the content managers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see also the other article about Information Governance:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioupdate.com/insights/article.php/3932156/IG-is-Everyones-Problem-Now&quot;&gt;go to&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2011 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2011-06-07T07:29:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/11508465/">
    <title>Whitepaper über ECM Eignung von Sharepoint (Pentadoc)</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/11508465/</link>
    <description>Pentadoc hat ein interessantes WhitePaper veröffentlicht betr. der ECM-&lt;br /&gt;
Tauglichkeit von Sharepoint 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pentadoc.com/Whitepaper.2141.0.html&quot;&gt;http://www.pentadoc.com/Whitepaper.2141.0.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
registration required&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thorough discussion also here on James Lappin&apos;s blog: one of the best comments about this topic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkingrecords.co.uk/2010/07/28/does-sharepoint-2010-have-a-sustainable-and-scaleable-records-management-model/&quot;&gt;Does SP 2010 have a sustainable RM Model?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-12-23T13:41:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/8376503/">
    <title>Compliance in Sharepoint - Governance needed</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/8376503/</link>
    <description>&quot;Since SharePoint is designed to reduce the need for IT involvement and put more control in the hands of end-users, procedural controls &lt;b&gt;must be established to ensure that the proliferation of sites, libraries and folders does not reach pandemic proportions&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
This is managed through an effective, multi-tiered governance structure that provides guidelines and scope at each level to provide boundaries on end-user creativity. These levels often are segmented at the farm, site-collection and site tiers, with each level building details on the decisions made in the tier above.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These requirements are almost impossible to implement in a big company.&lt;br /&gt;
Uncontrolled sprawling of Sharepoint instances in the organization can merely be stopped &lt;br /&gt;
once the deployment has been started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/White-Paper/Article/Five-Steps-to-Embed-Compliance-in-SharePoint-69923.aspx&quot;&gt;Wishful thinking&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-05T07:55:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6461659/">
    <title>Sharepoint 2010 for records management: thorough analysis</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6461659/</link>
    <description>The analysis of Sharepoint 2010 for RM by James Lappin on the AIIM ERM Blog is really&lt;br /&gt;
helpful and currently the most knowledgable in the community .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://aiimcommunities.org/erm/blog/there-sustainable-and-scaleable-records-management-model-sharepoint-2010&quot;&gt;James Lappin post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However some other comments state that &quot;the article seems more negative on SharePoint than it deserves.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://aiimcommunities.org/erm/blog/sharepoint-2010-rm-analysis&quot;&gt;see the comment by Mike Alsup &lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-10T06:42:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6353081/">
    <title>MOSS 2010 progress in RM</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6353081/</link>
    <description>MOSS 2010 is coming up with significant improvements related&lt;br /&gt;
to RM requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
HP is adding a backend with TRIM, so that scaling up and archiving will be improved &lt;br /&gt;
(hopefully).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;&quot; href=&quot;http://jhagmann.twoday.net/files/HP-TRIM/&quot;&gt;HP-TRIM&lt;/a&gt; (pdf, 1,936 KB)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Infos:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;&quot; href=&quot;http://jhagmann.twoday.net/files/MOSS-2010/&quot;&gt;MOSS-2010&lt;/a&gt; (docx, 24 KB)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis from AIIM:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;&quot; href=&quot;http://jhagmann.twoday.net/files/SP-ECM-AIIM/&quot;&gt;SP-ECM-AIIM&lt;/a&gt; (pdf, 183 KB)</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-05-26T12:16:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6189419/">
    <title>Sharepoint and ECM / RM</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6189419/</link>
    <description>Sharepoint is nothing for bean counters in IT. ... the clash of content &amp; technology!&lt;br /&gt;
(maybe this is the opportunity that IT is slowly going to understand the requirements&lt;br /&gt;
of RM in information mgmt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;First, we must acknowledge that SharePoint doesn&apos;t really fit any of the standard categories used to manage IT applications. It&apos;s not an ECM system in the sense of being exclusively focused on that function alone, though it can be used to manage content. It&apos;s not a search engine, though it can search across many types of content. It manages web content, but it manages lots of other content too. And finally, the straw that we always grasp at, it&apos;s a &quot;collaboration&quot; platform which is fuzziness itself when bean counters try to measure its ROI.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://aiim.typepad.com/aiim_blog/2010/02/8-ways-it-politics-can-wreck-a-sharepoint-project.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+EcmIndustryWatch+%28Digital+Landfill%29&quot;&gt;go to AIIM Blog&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-02-14T21:22:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6170057/">
    <title>Trends betr. Sharepoint (Amsterdam 2010 - Sharepoint Connections)</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6170057/</link>
    <description>Fünf Trends von der SharePoint Connections 2010 in Amsterdam:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jdk.de/de/news/20100126-funf-trends-von-der-sharepoint-connections-2010-in-amsterdam-4347/&quot;&gt;s. Link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-02-02T19:59:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6130497/">
    <title>MS Sharepoint als ECM Lösung? (Kommentar Kampffmeyer)</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/6130497/</link>
    <description>Kommentar s. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchstorage.de/forum/messages.cfm?threadid=412075FD-1DA2-4DD9-85BEC8ED43DEBC18&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nachricht aus dem Project Consult Newsletter 20091203:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Auf der SharePoint 2009 Konferenz in Las Vegas hat Microsoft Details zur neuen Sharepoint Version 2010 bekanntgegeben. Im Umfeld von ECM sind besonders Records Management-Funktionalitäten, wie Klassifizierung, Einhaltung der Aufbewahrungsregeln als auch Zugriffsrechte interessant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Wesentlich ist der Ansatz, die Informationsobjekte dort zu belassen, wo sie lagern, und nicht in Sharepoint-Repositories zu migieren. Dies bezeichnet man als In-Place-Management. Schwerpunkt ist die zentrale Kontrolle der Records, nicht deren Speicherung.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
(U. Kampffmeyer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Es ist richtig Sharepoint nicht als ECM Strategie zu definieren, sondern entweder als Frontend zu robusten repositories oder als reines Collaboration tool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
s. auch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise.de/resale/meldung/Sharepoint-weckt-ECM-aus-dem-Dornroeschenschlaf-895647.html&quot;&gt;ECM erwacht aus dem Schlaf - dank Sharepoint?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
JH</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2010 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-01-10T16:57:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5818822/">
    <title>Sharepoint Anwendungen brauchen Governance &amp; Richtlinien</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5818822/</link>
    <description>Was wir hier schon immer gesagt haben, wird bestätigt:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die AIIM rät Anwendern, nicht der IT das Feld zu überlassen und der Versuchung zu widerstehen, SharePoint wie jede andere Microsoft-Software einfach von der CD zu installieren und die Standardeinstellung unreflektiert zu übernehmen. Vielmehr ist ein Governance-Modell nötig, das eindeutig regelt, wie SharePoint-Lösungen entwickelt und genutzt werden dürfen. Grundsätzlich sind dabei die Dimensionen &quot;People&quot; (Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten), &quot;Policies&quot; (Richtlinien) und &quot;Processes&quot; (Leitfaden, wie zum Beispiel der Aufbau einer Site oder die Anpassung von Vorlagen (Themes) zu erfolgen hat) zu beachten.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerwoche.de/knowledge_center/business_intelligence/1900066/&quot;&gt;s. Computerwoche&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2009 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-12T17:45:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5738790/">
    <title>Sharepoint fördert die Content Silos in den Betrieben (Sprawling-Effekt)</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5738790/</link>
    <description>Mit Sharepoint hat Enterprise Content Management (ECM) neuen Schwung bekommen. Denn Microsofts Lösung bietet eine einfache und schnelle Möglichkeit, in das Thema einzusteigen. Doch so entstehen auch neue Content-Silos, die durch die firmenweite Inhalteverwaltung eigentlich Vergangenheit sein sollten.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerzeitung.de/articles/microsoft_sharepoint_treibt_enterprise_content_management:/2009024/31967470_ha_CZ.html?thes=8005,9818&amp;tp=/ausrichtungen/anwendungen&quot;&gt;s. Artikel in der Computer-Zeitung&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ich würde allerdings die Feststellung relativieren, dass es &quot;einfach&quot; sei eine Sharepoint Instanz zu installieren.</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2009 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-06-04T08:57:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5534450/">
    <title>Share Point recommendations from AIIM</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5534450/</link>
    <description>Last issue of Infonomics contains come interesting stuff for DM/RM Managers using SharePoint&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aiim.org/Infonomics/Taming-SharePoint-JanFeb2009-Feature.aspx&quot;&gt;Taming SharePoint&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aiim.org/Infonomics/Quick-Guide-Sharepoint-Governance.aspx&quot;&gt;Quick Guide to SharePoint Governance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trend is ...  toward using SharePoint as a front-end application and using other ECM platforms such as Open Text, Documentum, or IBMs FileNet, as a back-end repository. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
jh</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2009 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-02-22T19:32:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5512772/">
    <title>Sharepoint key questions for records mgmt</title>
    <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/stories/5512772/</link>
    <description>Very useful list of questions and open issues around SharePoint in Document &amp; Records Mgmt on tfpl blog&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.tfpl.com/tfpl/2009/02/sharepoint-2007-10-key-questions-for-records-managers.html&quot;&gt;Go to posting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from &lt;br /&gt;
James Lappin&lt;br /&gt;
Senior Associate consultant</description>
    <dc:creator>jhagmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>SharePoint</dc:subject>
    <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2009 jhagmann</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-02-12T21:26:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>


<textinput rdf:about="http://jhagmann.twoday.net/search">
   <title>find</title>
   <description>Search this site:</description>
   <name>q</name>
   <link>http://jhagmann.twoday.net/search</link>
</textinput>


</rdf:RDF>
