Records Mgmt & Archiving

The term "disruption" or "disruptive" is quite inflationary for the moment .

allbeit IT or collaboration - Clay Shirky: http://bit.ly/1crXRXo, processes, behavior etc.
C. McKinnon has written a nice article: http://bit.ly/1ibMFAD
Rethinking IM in the age of digital disruption; ....
everything is breaking in an extremely disruptive world: continuity seems to be out. Building trust in a disruptive age? - no more possible.

Bill Jensen (Simplicity) came up with a simple reader and a call to DISRUPT! BE EPIC AND THINK EPIC (25 successful habits about anything goes)
http://disruptmovement.com/

What for?

In the guiding principles for instance (p.148) it is suggested that HOW is the wrong question. Instead all about WHY is most important .

This is exactly the opposite of the core message of Dov Seidman's HOW book.
HOW we do anything means everything.
http://www.howistheanswer.com/

When it comes to the difficult question of information governance implementation, I prefer the HOW. It's much more ambitious ... a real task to build and orchestrate.

Professor William H.J. Hubbard from the University of Chicago Law School recently concluded his Preservation Costs Survey and the results are now available.

go to: http://bit.ly/1lx8gnx
download of executive summary and full report (for free)

The survey “is the first, and to date only, systematic effort to measure the extent and costs of preservation activity across a broad sample of companies,” and collected data from 128 companies, “including companies of all sizes and from a broad range of industries.”
The Survey generated conservative estimates of costs that are solely attributable to preservation obligations (scheduled records).
somehow a restricted scope of ESI.

No surprise, one of the results: Preservation of email and hard drives is the most common source of problems.