[>>]

Montag, 7. Januar 2008

Offene Formatstandards in Norwegen

Le gouvernement norvégien a décidé que toutes les informations disponibles sur ses sites Web officiels devraient être accessibles dans les formats ouverts de documents HTML, PDF ou ODF. Cela signifie la fin de l'époque où les documents officiels étaient publiés seulement dans des formats fermés.

voir:
http://formats-ouverts.org/blog/2007/12/22/1439-en-norvege-des-standards-ouverts

in english:
http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fad/pressesenter/pressemeldinger/2007/Open-document-standards-to-be-obligatory.html?id=494810

Data, documents, records

New York State has published a "Request for public comment" (RFPC) - for
A study concerning electronic record policy for New York State. Electronic records

Interesting definitions: data, documents, records

Terminology - Electronic "Records":

Concerning a similar survey, the State of Minnesota CIO recently noted that the "terms 'records', 'data', and 'documents' are often used interchangeably; the [Minnesota law requiring an e-records study] uses 'documents' and 'data' without distinguishing the two. But all of these terms have a separate legal meaning and significance in Minnesota, so it will be important to understand the exact distinctions any respondent makes in this survey."

This observation is equally true in New York State: words such as electronic "data" and "records" are terms of art with specific legal definitions. To avoid confusion, survey respondents are asked to please keep in mind the following basic distinctions. In this study and in the survey, the term:

* Electronic "data" will be conceptualized as electronic "information, evidencing any act, transaction, occurrence, event, or other activity." (NYS Technology Law § 302, the Electronic Signatures and Records Act or "ESRA");
* Electronic "documents" will be conceptualized as the "physical embodiment of information or ideas" (Black's Law Dictionary) within electronic "forms [which are] perceptible by human sensory capabilities." (ESRA);
* Electronic "records" will be conceptualized as being created when electronic data is "produced or stored by electronic means and accurately reproducible" (ESRA) as required; and
* Electronic copies of "official [government] records" will be conceptualized also in accordance with their legal definition, as electronic records made "in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities, or because of the information contained therein." (The NYS Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 57.05).

In summary, e-data fills e-documents creating e-records, some of which represent official State agency e-records requiring preservation. When being referred to inclusively and generically within this survey the term "electronic records" will be used. In your responses to the survey, please be sure to indicate if your usage of any term other than “electronic records” carries any special meaning or has any special implications.

see:
http://www.oft.state.ny.us/oftnews/erecords-study.htm

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Aktuelle Beiträge

Bericht über die...
Bericht von der 3. Records Management Konferenz vom...
jhagmann - 1. Dez, 12:25
ERM trends
Slideshare about the 2009 AIIM survey on Electronic...
jhagmann - 30. Nov, 22:16
Information governance...
Interesting post by AIIM Digital landfill: BearingPoint...
jhagmann - 30. Nov, 22:04
Digital Preservation...
Announcement: the next Digital Preservation Training...
jhagmann - 28. Nov, 10:08
Bericht zum ERFA Meeting...
Die erste Auflage des ERFA Meetings RM Schweiz unter...
jhagmann - 22. Nov, 20:57

Suche

 

Status

Online seit 1447 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 1. Dez, 12:26

Credits

Knallgrau New Media Solutions - Web Agentur für neue Medien

powered by Antville powered by Helma


xml version of this page

twoday.net AGB